click for - home click for - about click for - latest news click for - contact us click for - links
   
 
click for - commercial whaling and the IWC
click for - whaling despite the ban
click here for - environmental threats
click for - whales and fisheries
click for  - whale watching
click for - TAKE ACTION
click here for - 1
click here for - 2
click here for - 3
click here for - 4
click here for - 5
click here for - 6
Banner Photography:
© Clare Perry / EIA
 
The International Whaling Commission (IWC)


Photography: © Greenpeace
What is the IWC?

The International Whaling Commission (IWC) was established in 1946 as the decision-making body of the International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW).

Originally, the IWC had only 15 member nations – primarily those that were actively involved in commercial whaling. Over the years, as the issue of whale conservation grew, so did the IWC’s membership. Today, there are 78 member nations of the IWC, representing all continents.

In 1986, realizing the great negative impact that commercial whaling was having on whale populations around the globe, the IWC implemented a moratorium on commercial whaling – effectively creating a global ban on commercial whaling.

The whaling ban has provided the world’s great whales with a much-needed respite from large-scale commercial whaling. The moratorium protects the following whale species – sei, minke, fin, blue, right, bowhead, humpback, pygmy right, gray, Bryde’s, sperm and bottlenose whales.

Although some countries are legitimately allowed to continue small-scale “aboriginal subsistence” whale hunting, the ban on commercial whaling sets zero catch quotas for commercial purposes, and will do so until a ¾ majority of IWC member governments votes to change this. Despite continued whaling in breach of the moratorium by Japan, Norway and Iceland, the moratorium has been a great conservation success. Before the moratorium, tens of thousands of great whales were killed every year and without doubt many whale populations would now be extinct if the IWC had not implemented the moratorium.

However, despite the ban, several whaling nations continue their whaling practices citing an IWC resolution that allows lethal whale research to be carried out. This has become known as “scientific whaling” and is highly criticized by anti-whaling member nations of the IWC. Each year, more than 2,000 whales are killed under the sanction of allowable “scientific whaling.”

The result is that the IWC has now been divided into a pro-whaling camp – led by Japan, Norway and Iceland; and an anti-whaling camp led by Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the US. The pro-whalers regularly attempt to propose resolutions that would reverse the whaling moratorium, while anti-whalers strive for a more conservation oriented agenda for the IWC, and have passed several resolutions denouncing so-called “scientific whaling.”

To counter this, in recent years, Japan has lobbied for the support of several small island nations across the Caribbean and Pacific to join the IWC and to vote with them for the whaling moratorium to be lifted. Critics claim that the votes of some of these member nations are “bought” by Japan using fisheries development aid funding, and that the pro-whaling voice of these nation’s representatives to the IWC do not reflect the views of the general public from these nations.The Caribbean countries of St. Lucia, Antigua & Barbuda, and St. Vincent & the Grenadines were all IWC members in 1982 and voted in favor of the whaling moratorium. Although a member at the time, Dominica did not vote on the moratorium and left the IWC in 1983, rejoining in 1992 and supporting Japan’s position. After the moratorium was implemented in 1986, St. Lucia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines changed their position in favor of Japan’s pro-whaling policies, a move that was swiftly followed by new Japanese fisheries aid grants to those countries. Grenada and St. Kitts & Nevis joined the IWC in the early 1990s and have voted consistently with Japan on key issues, although St. Kitts & Nevis did not obtain voting rights until 1999. Antigua & Barbuda changed its position to a pro-whaling one in 1996, after being the only Caribbean country to cast a vote in favor of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary in 1994.


Photography: © Chris Johnson
How does the IWC work?

IWC members meet annual to review and discuss key issues and to vote on newly proposed measures. The next and 60th meeting of the IWC is scheduled for June 2008 in Santiago, Chile. A rotating, elected member of the commission chairs the IWC. Currently, Dr. William Hogarth of the U.S. serves as the chairman, while Mr. Minoru Morimoto of Japan serves as the Vice-Chair.  

The annual IWC meeting is preceded by a two-week meeting of the Scientific Committee, where a large group of government scientists and invited experts discuss issues such as whale biology, population numbers, small cetacean issues and environmental issues affecting whales.


Photography: © Claire Bass / EIA
Between the Scientific Committee and the Commission meeting, a series of working groups and technical committees meet, to discuss a variety of issues that are then reported to the Commission meeting, along with the Scientific Committee report. The Scientific Committee and sub-group reports are confidential until the first day of the Commission meeting.

NGO observers can attend IWC meetings, but are generally not allowed on the floor to make interventions. Media representatives are also present at the Commission meeting.

Photography: © Claire Bass / EIA For full details of the IWC and the upcoming 60th meeting of the IWC in Santiago, Chile in June 2008, please visit: www.iwcoffice.org. A list of documents including the agenda and many background documents are also available on the site.


Photography: © BreathtakingWhales.com
IWC 60 – Santiago, Chile
IWC 59 – Anchorage, Alaska

 
This website and the whale ad is facilitated by the non-profit Environmental Investigation Agency (www.eia-global.org). We work to protect endangered species and the natural environment. We investigate environmental crime around the world, working with local NGOs, policy makers, government departments and enforcement authorities working co-operatively for achievable and constructive solutions.

michael ashcroft logoThe website and ad are supported by Lord Ashcroft KCMG.
Click here to visit the website of the Michael A Ashcroft Foundation.

  Site Hosted on 100% Solar Powered Servers  |  Site designed by Revolting Ltd